Virginia Tech Hands Maryland First Loss, Holds Off Late Terps Rally for 35-26 Victory

COLLEGE PARK, Md. — Maryland showed plenty of fight Saturday night, but a furious fourth-quarter comeback could not erase three quarters controlled by Virginia Tech. The Hokies defeated the Terrapins 35-26 in front of a sold-out crowd of 46,185 at SECU Stadium, dropping Maryland to 2-1 while Virginia Tech improved to 3-0. The loss also ended Maryland’s nation-leading 20-game nonconference winning streak, with the Terrapins suffering their first nonconference defeat since 2019.
Maryland quarterback Malik Washington nearly brought the Terrapins back after they trailed by 21 points in the second half. Washington completed 30 of 43 passes for 359 yards and three touchdowns without throwing an interception, while Chris Durr Jr. delivered a career night with 12 receptions for 109 yards and two scores. Maryland ultimately could not overcome Virginia Tech’s early offensive efficiency, lack of a consistent running game and inability to get the Hokies off the field on critical downs.
Virginia Tech Controls the Opening Quarter
Virginia Tech wasted no time establishing its offensive game plan, taking the opening possession 75 yards on 13 plays. Quarterback Ethan Grunkemeyer repeatedly kept the Hokies ahead of the chains before connecting with Luke Reynolds for a 14-yard touchdown to give Virginia Tech a 7-0 advantage. The possession consumed 6:45 and immediately forced Maryland’s defense to spend an extended period on the field.
Things did not get much easier for Maryland after the opening touchdown. Virginia Tech outgained the Terrapins 143-12 during the first quarter, while Maryland struggled to establish either its running game or downfield passing attack. The Hokies carried their 7-0 advantage into the second quarter while already threatening to score again.
Maryland linebacker Nahsir Taylor briefly appeared to change the momentum when he recorded a sack near the goal line, and two Virginia Tech false starts also pushed the Hokies backward. Instead of settling for a field goal, however, Grunkemeyer turned third-and-goal from the 18 into one of the defining plays of the night. The quarterback escaped the collapsing pocket, broke through Maryland’s defense and ran 18 yards for a touchdown just seconds into the second quarter.
Maryland blocked the ensuing extra-point attempt, leaving Virginia Tech with a 13-0 advantage. Even with the blocked kick, the first two Virginia Tech possessions demonstrated the challenge facing Maryland’s defense. The Hokies had produced 149 yards on 24 plays while keeping the Terrapins defense on the field for more than 12 minutes.
Maryland Finally Finds an Offensive Spark
Washington finally generated the explosive play Maryland needed on the ensuing possession. He connected with Kaleb Webb for a 44-yard completion that moved Maryland deep into Virginia Tech territory, setting up the Terrapins’ first touchdown. Iverson Howard finished the possession with a 2-yard touchdown run, and Maryland suddenly had the deficit down to 13-7.
The touchdown energized the sold-out SECU Stadium crowd, but Maryland’s defense could not capitalize on the momentum. Grunkemeyer answered by finding Jeffrey Overton Jr. on a short pass that Overton turned into a 49-yard touchdown. Virginia Tech had quickly rebuilt its lead to 20-7 with 9:14 remaining before halftime.
That sequence became representative of the entire game. Whenever Maryland appeared ready to make the contest competitive, Virginia Tech answered with another extended drive or explosive play. The Terrapins were producing enough offense to stay within striking distance, but their defense could not string together enough stops.
Durr Helps Maryland Fight Back
Washington continued working the football to Durr as the second quarter progressed. The Terrapins eventually put together another scoring possession, and Washington found Durr for a 12-yard touchdown with 2:11 remaining before halftime. Maryland had trimmed Virginia Tech’s advantage to 20-14 and appeared positioned to enter halftime with momentum.
A defensive stop would have been enormous because Maryland was scheduled to receive the second-half kickoff. Instead, Virginia Tech produced perhaps its most important possession of the entire game. The Hokies traveled 75 yards on 11 plays in only 1:55, converting multiple critical downs along the way.
Grunkemeyer completed the possession by finding tight end Ja’Ricous Hairston for a 2-yard touchdown with only 16 seconds remaining. Instead of going to halftime trailing by six, Maryland suddenly found itself behind 27-14. Virginia Tech had taken Maryland’s late-half momentum and completely reversed it.
Third Downs Crush Maryland in the First Half
Virginia Tech’s first-half offensive numbers illustrated exactly why Maryland found itself facing a 13-point deficit. The Hokies accumulated 302 yards before halftime and converted eight of their nine third-down opportunities. Virginia Tech’s eight first-half third-down conversions tied its highest total in a half dating to 1987.
Maryland repeatedly put Virginia Tech into situations where one defensive play could have ended a possession. Grunkemeyer and the Hokies repeatedly made that play instead, keeping drives alive and preventing Maryland’s offense from getting back onto the field. Virginia Tech held the ball for 19:28 in the opening half compared with only 10:32 for Maryland.
That possession advantage also placed additional pressure on Washington. Maryland had demonstrated that it could move the football, but Virginia Tech was limiting how many opportunities the Terrapins had to do it. Maryland therefore entered halftime needing both a faster offensive start and dramatically improved third-down defense.
Maryland Misses Its Opportunity After Halftime
Maryland received the second-half kickoff with an opportunity to immediately make it a one-possession game. Instead, the Terrapins went three-and-out, giving the football right back to an offense they had struggled to stop. Virginia Tech responded with another long scoring possession.
The Hokies traveled 67 yards on 11 plays while consuming 6:12. Marcellous Hawkins Jr. converted an important fourth down, Grunkemeyer found Davion Brown for a 27-yard gain and Reynolds produced another crucial third-down reception. Overton eventually finished the possession with a 2-yard touchdown run.
Virginia Tech then successfully converted a two-point attempt, extending its advantage to 35-14 with 7:29 remaining in the third quarter. The Hokies had now scored touchdowns on five of their first six possessions. Maryland had fallen three touchdowns behind despite not committing a turnover.
Long Virginia Tech Drives Wear Down Maryland
Perhaps the most concerning aspect of Virginia Tech’s offensive performance was where its drives started. The Hokies were not repeatedly receiving the football inside Maryland territory because of turnovers or major special-teams mistakes. Virginia Tech was consistently taking possession deep in its own territory and moving the football down the field.
The Hokies’ five touchdown possessions covered 75, 74, 75, 75 and 67 yards. That meant Maryland was repeatedly being asked to defend the entire field, and Virginia Tech continued finding answers. Grunkemeyer’s accuracy, Reynolds’ reliability underneath and a balanced rushing attack kept the Terrapins from consistently dictating the game defensively.
Virginia Tech ultimately finished with 445 total yards while Maryland produced 423. The overall difference of only 22 yards makes the game appear relatively even statistically, but Virginia Tech controlled the majority of the first three quarters before Maryland piled up yards during its comeback attempt. The Hokies also possessed the football for more than 36 minutes.
Washington Starts Maryland’s Comeback
Maryland refused to go away after falling behind 35-14. Washington began attacking Virginia Tech through the air and directed a 13-play, 81-yard possession that stretched into the fourth quarter. He finished the drive with a 2-yard touchdown pass to Dorian Fleming with 12:36 remaining.
The Terrapins attempted a two-point conversion in hopes of reducing Virginia Tech’s advantage to 13 points. The attempt failed, leaving Maryland behind 35-20. Despite the missed conversion, Maryland had finally found the offensive rhythm it needed.
The defense also began producing the stops that had been missing throughout the first three quarters. Virginia Tech would not score another point after Overton’s third-quarter touchdown. That gave Washington an opportunity to make what had once been a 21-point deficit interesting.
Durr Scores Again
Maryland’s next scoring drive included one of Washington’s biggest throws of the night. He connected with Na’eem Abdul-Rahim Gladding for a 43-yard gain, quickly moving Maryland into position to threaten Virginia Tech again. Washington eventually found Durr for a 13-yard touchdown with 5:34 remaining.
Maryland had scored 12 consecutive points and reduced the deficit to 35-26. The Terrapins again attempted a two-point conversion, hoping to pull within seven and make it a true one-possession game. Virginia Tech stopped the conversion for the second time, leaving Maryland nine points behind.
The failed conversions became increasingly significant because Maryland needed two possessions rather than one. Had the Terrapins converted the second attempt, the score would have been 35-28 and one touchdown could have tied the game. Instead, Virginia Tech remained in control of its own destiny.
Hokies Finish the Game on Offense
Maryland needed one more defensive stop to give Washington an opportunity to continue the comeback. Virginia Tech instead leaned on the same formula that had worked throughout the night, using Grunkemeyer and Reynolds to move the chains. The decisive play came on fourth-and-1 with less than three minutes remaining.
Grunkemeyer rolled to his right and connected with Reynolds, who stretched the football beyond the line to gain. Officials reviewed the play and upheld the first-down ruling. Maryland had already exhausted its timeouts, allowing Virginia Tech to run out the remaining clock.
That final conversion was a fitting conclusion to the game. Maryland had spent much of the night getting Virginia Tech into third- and fourth-down situations without finishing the possession. The Hokies made one more critical conversion when the Terrapins absolutely had to get off the field.
Washington Delivers 359-Yard Performance
Washington’s final statistics were impressive despite the loss. He completed 30 of 43 passes for 359 yards and three touchdowns, did not throw an interception and helped Maryland produce 423 total yards. His ability to attack different areas of Virginia Tech’s defense gave Maryland a chance to make the fourth quarter competitive.
Washington also spread the football around to several receivers. Durr led Maryland with 12 receptions for 109 yards and two touchdowns, Fleming added six receptions for 72 yards and a touchdown and Webb caught five passes for a career-high 98 yards. Maryland’s passing game accounted for 359 of the team’s 423 yards.
That final number also identifies one of Maryland’s biggest offensive problems. The Terrapins managed only 64 rushing yards for the entire game, forcing Washington to shoulder a massive portion of the offensive responsibility. Harry Dalton III led Maryland with only 26 rushing yards.
Durr Continues His Breakout
Durr’s performance was more than simply a productive night in the box score. His 12 receptions gave him consecutive games with at least 10 catches, making him the only Maryland player this century to accomplish that feat. Durr also joined DJ Moore and Torrey Smith as the only Terrapins over the last 30 years to record at least 12 receptions, 100 receiving yards and two touchdowns in one game.
Durr also surpassed 1,000 career receiving yards during the game. Fleming reached the same milestone while recording his six receptions for 72 yards and a touchdown. Maryland therefore came out of the loss with additional evidence that Washington has a deep and productive group of receiving options.
Durr was especially valuable once Maryland became almost completely dependent on the passing game. Virginia Tech knew Washington needed to throw, yet Durr continued finding openings and producing first downs. His second touchdown gave Maryland its best chance of completing the comeback.
Grunkemeyer Nearly Flawless for Virginia Tech
Grunkemeyer was the biggest reason Virginia Tech controlled the game. The Hokies quarterback completed 31 of 39 attempts for 314 yards and three touchdowns without throwing an interception. He also scored on the 18-yard scramble, giving him four total touchdowns.
The performance continued an excellent start to the season for Grunkemeyer. He threw for 327 yards against Old Dominion before producing 314 against Maryland, becoming Virginia Tech’s first quarterback since Ryan Willis in 2018 to record consecutive 300-yard passing games. His 31 completions against Maryland also matched the career high he established a week earlier.
Most importantly, Grunkemeyer did not give Maryland easy opportunities. He protected the football, consistently completed manageable throws and punished the Terrapins when they lost discipline defensively. Against a Maryland defense desperate for a momentum-changing takeaway, Grunkemeyer never provided one.
Reynolds Becomes Grunkemeyer’s Security Blanket
Reynolds was Virginia Tech’s leading receiver with 12 catches for 107 yards and the opening touchdown. His production was particularly damaging because many of his receptions came when Virginia Tech needed to extend possessions. Maryland repeatedly struggled to account for the tight end in critical situations.
Reynolds also became Virginia Tech’s first player since Damon Hazelton in 2018 to record consecutive 100-yard receiving performances. More than one-third of Grunkemeyer’s 31 completions against Maryland went to Reynolds. Their connection ultimately helped Virginia Tech convert the fourth down that ended Maryland’s comeback hopes.
Virginia Tech did not depend exclusively on Reynolds, either. Nine different Hokies caught at least one pass, continuing a streak in which at least nine players have recorded a reception in each of Virginia Tech’s first three games. That distribution made it difficult for Maryland to simply eliminate one target and disrupt the Hokies’ offense.
Overton Hurts Maryland in Multiple Ways
Overton was another major problem for Maryland’s defense. His 49-yard touchdown reception immediately answered Maryland’s first score, preventing the Terrapins from building momentum after cutting the deficit to 13-7. He later scored on the 2-yard run that helped push Virginia Tech’s lead to 35-14.
Overton’s ability to contribute as both a runner and receiver added another element Maryland needed to defend. The Terrapins already had to account for Grunkemeyer’s passing ability, Reynolds underneath and Hawkins in the running game. Overton provided another versatile option capable of creating explosive plays.
Marcellous Hawkins Jr. also gave Virginia Tech something Maryland never established — a consistent rushing threat. Hawkins led the Hokies with 75 rushing yards. That production helped Virginia Tech maintain offensive balance and control possession late in the game.
Maryland Could Not Run the Football
Maryland’s 64 rushing yards were a significant factor in the loss. Virginia Tech did not have to consistently respect a dangerous Terrapins running attack, especially once the Hokies established a double-digit lead. That allowed the Hokies to focus more attention on Washington and Maryland’s receivers.
Dalton led Maryland with 26 rushing yards, meaning no Terrapins player even reached 30 yards on the ground. Howard scored Maryland’s lone rushing touchdown but could not provide consistent yardage between the tackles. Maryland therefore became increasingly one-dimensional as the deficit grew.
Washington proved capable of handling a pass-heavy workload Saturday. However, asking a quarterback to consistently produce 350-plus passing yards against Power Four opponents is not an ideal long-term formula. Maryland will need more balance as the schedule shifts into Big Ten play.
Possession Tells the Story
Virginia Tech’s dominance in time of possession was another major factor. The Hokies held the football for more than 36 minutes, limiting the number of opportunities Washington had to attack. Maryland possessed the ball for fewer than 24 minutes.
That discrepancy was created largely by Virginia Tech’s success on conversion downs. The Hokies finished 10-for-16 on third down and also converted both of their fourth-down attempts, giving them a combined 12 successful conversions on 18 third- and fourth-down opportunities. Virginia Tech’s official recap highlighted that 12-of-18 performance as a central reason the offense controlled the game.
Maryland’s defense therefore faced 75 Virginia Tech offensive plays. Even when the Terrapins created favorable down-and-distance situations, they too often allowed the Hokies to escape. By the time Maryland’s defense began consistently forcing punts, the deficit had reached 21 points.
No Turnovers Means Maryland Had to Earn Everything
Neither team committed a turnover, which made Maryland’s inability to generate defensive stops even more significant. The Terrapins never received a short field or sudden momentum swing from an interception or fumble recovery. Virginia Tech also played clean football and refused to provide Maryland with an easy path back into the game.
Washington deserves credit for protecting the football despite throwing 43 passes. Grunkemeyer was equally careful while attempting 39 passes, allowing Virginia Tech to maintain control without giving Maryland extra possessions. In a game with zero turnovers, third-down execution and sustained drives became even more important.
Virginia Tech won those areas for most of the night. Maryland eventually found its rhythm, but the Hokies had already established too large of an advantage. The 21-point third-quarter deficit forced Maryland to play nearly perfect football down the stretch.
A Sold-Out Crowd Watches the Streak End
Saturday represented a major early-season opportunity for Maryland, with 46,185 fans filling SECU Stadium. The game kicked off at 7:40 p.m. under clear conditions and lasted three hours and 37 minutes. Maryland entered undefeated and riding the longest active nonconference winning streak in the FBS.
Virginia Tech ended that streak at 20 games. Maryland had not lost to a nonconference opponent since 2019, making September victories outside the Big Ten one of the program’s most consistent accomplishments in recent seasons. The Hokies simultaneously ended their own 15-game losing streak against nonconference Power Four opponents.
Virginia Tech also improved to 3-0 for the first time since 2017. James Franklin’s first season with the Hokies has therefore started with three consecutive victories, and Virginia Tech will now carry that momentum into ACC play.
Maryland Turns Toward Big Ten Play
Maryland’s nonconference portion of the schedule ends with the Terrapins at 2-1. The loss does not erase the positives from the first three games, but Virginia Tech provided the clearest indication yet of where Maryland needs to improve. The Terrapins now have to make those corrections while entering conference competition.
Maryland will remain at SECU Stadium to host UCLA next Saturday. The matchup will begin the Terrapins’ Big Ten schedule and give Maryland an immediate opportunity to respond to its first loss. Virginia Tech will travel to Boston College to begin ACC play.
For Maryland, the biggest question will be whether the problems exposed Saturday can be corrected quickly. The Terrapins have a productive quarterback and multiple receiving weapons, but the running game and defense need to provide Washington with considerably more support. Conference play will make those weaknesses increasingly difficult to overcome.
MSB Take
Maryland showed something important in the fourth quarter Saturday night: this team did not quit. Falling behind 35-14 could have turned the game into a blowout, but Washington continued attacking and the defense finally began getting Virginia Tech off the field. The Terrapins scored 12 unanswered points and forced the Hokies to finish the game rather than simply coast through the fourth quarter.
Washington was one of the biggest positives to come out of the loss. Throwing for 359 yards and three touchdowns without an interception against a Power Four opponent is impressive, particularly when Maryland could not establish its running game. Durr, Fleming and Webb also showed that Maryland has enough receiving talent to create problems for quality defenses.
The bigger concern is that Washington had to do so much. Maryland rushed for only 64 yards, while Virginia Tech produced 131 and maintained enough offensive balance to keep the Terrapins guessing. If Maryland becomes dependent on Washington throwing 40-plus times every week, opposing Big Ten defenses will eventually make the Terrapins pay.
Maryland’s defense also has significant work ahead. Allowing Virginia Tech to convert eight of nine third downs in the first half and 10 of 16 for the game prevented the Terrapins from establishing any consistent rhythm. The five Hokies touchdown drives covering at least 67 yards show that Virginia Tech did not need turnovers or short fields to score.
The two failed two-point conversions hurt Maryland’s comeback, but they were not why the Terrapins lost. The game was primarily decided during the first three quarters, when Virginia Tech built a 35-14 lead and forced Maryland into desperation mode. The Terrapins cannot expect to repeatedly overcome three-touchdown deficits against quality opponents.
There is still plenty to build around. Washington looks capable of leading this offense, Durr continues developing into one of his most reliable targets and Maryland proved it can move the football against Power Four competition. What Maryland needs now is a more complete performance around them.
The nonconference winning streak is over, and Maryland is 2-1. More importantly, the schedule is about to become much less forgiving as Big Ten play begins. The response against UCLA will tell us much more about this Maryland team than one September loss to Virginia Tech.

